1; [12, 21, 22]). The role of IRFs in regulating IFN-β and IL-6 expression following CpG stimulation selleck products of CAL-1 cells was examined by nuclear translocation assays

and transient knockdown experiments (Fig. 2 and 4). Previous reports showed that IRFs 3 and 7 were the main inducers of type I IFN following virus infection of human pDCs [1, 17, 41, 48]. Yet, neither of those IRFs was involved in the gene activation induced by “K” ODN (Fig. 4). Rather, “K” ODN induced the rapid translocation of IRF-5 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, followed several hours later by the translocation of IRF-1 (Fig. 2A and B). siRNA-mediated knockdown studies confirmed that IRF-5 but not IRF-1 played a central role in regulating “K” ODN mediated IFN-β and IL-6 mRNA expression (Fig. 4). Experiments involving IRF-5 KO mice showed that the induction of IL-6 but not type I IFN was impaired in CpG-stimulated pDCs [15]. Yet, Paun et al. [45] reported IWR 1 that IFN-β mRNA declined when DCs from IRF-5 KO mice were stimulated with “K” ODN. Due to differences in the splice patterns of murine versus human IRF-5, it was unclear whether the murine results would be applicable to human

pDCs [47]. Current findings clarify that IRF-5 plays a critical role in the upregulation of IFN-β and IL-6 in CpG-stimulated human pDCs. Evidence that MyD88 associates with IRF-5 in the cytoplasm was previously provided by studies involving murine HEK293T cells that overexpressed both proteins [15]. The current work examined this

issue by transfecting CAL-1 cells with HA-tagged MyD88. Immunoprecipitation using anti-HA Ab provided the first evidence that endogenous IRF-5 as well as IRF-7 physically interacted with MyD88 under physiologic conditions in human pDC-like cells. Importantly, “K” ODN stimulation led to a significant decline in the amount of IRF-5 that co-precipitated with MyD88 (Fig. 5). This observation is consistent with the data showing that IRF-5 (but not IRF-7) translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of “K” ODN activated CAL-1 cells (Fig. 2 A and B). Controversy exists regarding Vasopressin Receptor the role of IRF-1 in CpG-mediated gene activation [16, 49]. Schmitz et al. [16] observed that cytokine production was impaired in CpG-treated DCs from IRF-1 KO mice and concluded that IRF-1 contributed to the subsequent upregulation of IFN-β. In contrast, Liu et al. [49] reported that “K” ODN actively inhibited the binding of IRF-1 to the IFN-β promoter of murine DCs, thereby preventing the upregulation of type I IFN. Current findings indicate that IRF-1 accumulates in the nucleus of CpG-stimulated CAL-1 cells, but that this is a relatively late event (Fig. 2A and B) mediated by an increase in mRNA influenced by type 1 IFN feedback (Fig. 2C). In this context, the knockdown of IRF-1 had no impact on early or late IFN-β and IL-6 expression (Fig. 4B and C). Thus, current findings lead to a reinterpretation of the results of Schmitz et al. and Liu et al.