4B) of Hax1−/− mice were decreased for the CD4+ the CD8+ T-cell p

4B) of Hax1−/− mice were decreased for the CD4+ the CD8+ T-cell population (Hax1−/−: 6.55±1.86×106 and WT: 17.20±2.44×106 for CD4+ cells; p<0.001; Hax1−/−: 2.72±0.69×106 and WT: 7.76±1.79×106 for CD8+ cells; p<0.001). To evaluate the response of Hax1−/− B cells to key B-cell mitogens and

growth factors, splenic resting B cells of Hax1−/− and WT mice were isolated, labelled with CFSE and stimulated with anti-IgM F(ab’)2 plus anti-CD40, IL-4 plus anti-CD40 or LPS alone (Fig. 5B). In parallel, splenic CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 (Fig. 5C). LPS-induced proliferation was slightly increased in Hax1−/− mice, while all other stimuli, for both B and T cells, showed no difference between Hax1−/− and WT mice. Next, we asked selleck compound whether Hax1−/− B cells were able to produce serum immunoglobulins at normal levels. We determined the

levels of IgM, IgG1, IgG2a and IgE in the serum of 7- to 8-wk-old naïve mice and found that the selleck inhibitor levels in Hax1−/− mice resembled those from WT littermates (Fig. 5A) except for the IgG2a levels, which were slightly but significantly lower in Hax1−/− mice. We next asked Whether the observed defects in B lymphocyte development were of B-cell-intrinsic or -extrinsic origin. Therefore, we performed adoptive transfer experiments using the congenic CD45.1/CD45.2 system. Lin– bone marrow cells from Hax1−/− and WT mice were transferred i.v. to reconstitute lethally irradiated CD45.1+/+ BALB/c mice. Analysis of the peripheral blood by flow cytometry 6 wk after transfer showed a weak increase in the percentage of circulating B220+ cells

and a parallel reduction in TCR+ cells in recipients of Hax1−/− cells compared to controls. Twelve weeks post transfer, this difference in the composition of the peripheral blood became negligible (Fig. 6A). Fourteen to sixteen weeks after transfer, the cell numbers of spleen, thymus and bone marrow from recipients of Hax1−/− and WT bone marrow cells, others respectively, were basically indistinguishable (Fig. 6B). Flow cytometric analysis of the bone marrow from recipients (Fig. 6C; primary gating history is shown in Supporting Information Fig. 2) demonstrated that the transfer of Hax1−/− bone marrow cells into a HAX1+ environment gave rise to normal levels of B220+ cells and functional B-cell subsets (Hax1−/−: 7.88±1.61×106 and WT: 7.26±3.16×106 for B220+; Hax1−/−: 2.11±0.45×106 and WT: 1.80±0.61×106 for B220+CD43+; Hax1−/−: 5.73±1.15×106 and WT: 5.41±2.53×106 for B220+CD43−; Hax1−/−: 0.46±0.08×106 and WT: 0.46±0.18×106 for Fr. A; Hax1−/−: 1.02±0.28×106 and WT: 0.69±0.22×106 for Fr. B; Hax1−/−: 0.47±0.10×106 and WT: 0.49±0.19×106 for Fr. C; Hax1−/−: 3.02±0.42×106 and WT: 2.85±1.22×106 for Fr. D; Hax1−/−: 1.35±0.37×106 and WT: 1.09±0.53×106 for Fr. E; Hax1−/−: 0.45±0.17×106 and WT: 0.47±0.26×106 for Fr. F). Accordingly, no differences were observed in splenic B-cell subsets (Fig. 6D; primary gating history is shown in Supporting Information Fig.

Comments are closed.