Older adults with visual impairments are affected by age-related deterioration in balance to an even greater extent than the general population.18 Thus, exercise and physical training

warrant particular investigation as fall prevention strategies for people with visual impairment living in the community, as well as in residential care settings. Mobility, balance, strength and proprioception are aspects of physical function that have been identified as risk factors for falls. Thus, the impact of exercise on these factors, as well as on falls themselves, was investigated. Therefore, the research questions for this review were: 1. Does Selleckchem DAPT exercise or other physical training improve Alisertib datasheet physical function in older adults with visual impairments? A search of the literature was conducted in February 2013 of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The MEDLINE search strategy used is shown in

Appendix 1 (see eAddenda) and this was adapted for other databases. Supplementary searches of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS) were also undertaken. The searches sought trials of exercise and training to improve physical function or reduce falls in older adults with untreatable visual impairments. The inclusion criteria are summarised in Box 1. Design • Randomised controlled trials or trials with factorial design Participants • Older adults ≥ 60 years of age Intervention • Exercise Outcome measures • Measures of physical function with performance tests or questionnaires Comparisons • Exercise program designed to enhance physical function compared with

control program or usual care The researchers were not blinded Cediranib (AZD2171) to any aspects of the papers. Study titles and abstracts were independently screened by two investigators (MG and LK) for inclusion in the review and any discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third investigator (CS). Data were extracted by one investigator (MG) and checked by a second investigator (CS) and any discrepancies resolved by discussion. Data extracted included: the settings in which the trials were conducted; the characteristics of the participants (age, gender and visual status); the programs provided to the intervention and control groups; and outcome measures. The studies had already been assessed for quality using the PEDro scale,19 which includes items related to risk of bias and completeness of reporting, and reported on PEDro (http://www.pedro.org.au). Studies were not excluded on the basis of the rating. Only published, randomised trials were eligible. Language of publication was not an exclusion criterion.