Regarding the results of our neuropsychologic assessment (with Bonferroni correction, α = 0.01) in the two subgroups of patients with Duchenne muscular

dystrophy (Fig 3), patients with both distally and proximally mutated Duchenne muscular dystrophy performed at a lower level than control subjects in Visual Attention, whereas only patients with distally mutated Duchenne muscular dystrophy exhibited deficits in Visual Abstract Memory. The difference in Visual Memory between the Venetoclax two subgroups was not significant (t(40) = −1.936, P = 0.06), and trended further from significance when intelligence quotient was entered as a covariate (P = 0.10). Moreover, the differences between patients with distally mutated Duchenne muscular dystrophy and control subjects concerning Auditory Attention (though with z-scores greater than 0; t (32) = 2.603, P = 0.012), Visual Attention (t(33) = 3.476, P = 0.001), and Visual Memory (t(33) = 3.552, P = 0.001) became nonsignificant (P > 0.25) when intelligence quotient was included as a covariate. Children with proximally mutated Duchenne muscular dystrophy performed (almost significantly) worse than control subjects on Visual Attention only (t(25) = 2.452, P = 0.022), but this difference, in contrast with

the findings for the Duchenne muscular dystrophy distal group, appeared to be independent of influences Selisistat mouse from intelligence quotients. Interestingly, no deficits in Auditory Attention, List Learning, and Memory for Names were evident Baf-A1 chemical structure in any of the subgroups. Finally, the two groups of control patients and patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy were compared on tests of reading accuracy and speed. The results are reported in Fig 4. No Bonferroni correction was applied, because all measures were highly intercorrelated. The children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy appeared to be particularly slow

in reading text and words, and partly slow in reading nonwords. However, the reading performances were rather similar in the two groups with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and no significant differences were evident between distally and proximally mutated children. Taken separately, the Duchenne muscular dystrophy distal group performed at a significantly lower level than control subjects in text reading speed (t(30) = 2.135, P = 0.041), and the same held true for the Duchenne muscular dystrophy proximal group (t(25) = 2.229, P = 0.035). In both groups, variations in intelligence quotient, entered in the analysis as a covariate, explained all differences. The patterns of correlations between reading skills and other linguistic or neuropsychologic functions were also investigated, to evaluate whether different sources of impairment were identifiable in the two subgroups of children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.