Scand J Work Environ Health 23:58–65 Veiersted KB, Westgaard RH (1993) Development of trapezius myalgia among female workers performing light manual work. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:277–283 Voerman GE, Sandsjö L, Vollenbroeck-Hutten

M, Larsman P, Kadefors R, Hermens H (2007) Effects of ambulant myofeedback training and ergonomic counselling in female computer workers with work-related neck-shoulder complaints: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 17:137–152CrossRef Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149CrossRef Wahlström J, Hagberg M, Toomingas A, Wigaeus Tornqvist E (2004) Perceived muscular tension, job strain, physical exposure, and associations with neck pain among VDU users: a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 61:523–528CrossRef”
“Introduction Nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant (or multi-resistant) Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are selleck screening library on the increase (Boucher and

Corey 2008; Gastmeier et al. 2008). The increased prevalence of MRSA in healthcare settings poses an increased risk of exposure to MRSA among healthcare workers (HCWs) (Albrich and Harbarth 2008). Various studies into the frequency of MRSA infection among www.selleckchem.com/products/DMXAA(ASA404).html medical and care personnel have been published reporting prevalence rates between 1 and 15% (Albrich and Harbarth 2008; Blok et al. 2003; Joos 2009; Kaminski et al. 2007; Scarnato et al. why 2003). Due to different study EPZ004777 manufacturer designs, the prevalence rates were not comparable. Moreover, the studies were carried out during outbreaks and therefore did not represent prevalence data for staff in situations with endemic

MRSA. As there are no recommendations in Germany for routine screening of HCWs (KRINKO 1999; Simon et al. 2009), there is only limited prevalence data on endemic MRSA in healthcare settings. Under German law, infection due to workplace exposure may be recognized as an occupational disease (OD) and is subject to compensation if the relationship between occupational activity and disease is regarded as probable (Code of Social Law, SGB VII). Recognition of an occupationally acquired infection and hence the liability of an insurer with respect to OD requires evidence of an identifiable, plausible means of transmission, e.g. the identification of an index patient. In the event that an index patient cannot be found, it is still possible to grant recognition of an OD if the claimant’s area of employment poses an increased risk of infection, and comparable, non-occupational risks of infection are considered unlikely (presumed causality clause in SGB VII, Art. 9, Para. 3). This legislation regulation presupposes the existence of epidemiological data to assess workplace risk. In the event that the legal conditions are not fulfilled, the claim can be rejected by the insurer. As colonization with Staphylococci is a natural status (Kluytmans et al.